The recent departure of former Padang Serai MP N. Surendran from PKR has sparked discussions and debates within the political landscape of Malaysia. Surendran, a former vice president of PKR, has been known for his vocal criticism of the Unity Government led by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. His departure was not unexpected, given his open disapproval of the administration’s decisions and actions.
Surendran’s criticism of the Unity Government, particularly his recent condemnation of Pakatan Harapan’s silence regarding the investigation into allegations against former Damansara MP Tony Pua, has highlighted the growing dissatisfaction among PH supporters. Pua was investigated under the Sedition Act 1948 for a Facebook post mocking the decision of the Pardons Board to grant a reduction in Najib Razak’s prison sentence and fine.
According to Ilham Centre’s Executive Director Hisommudin Bakar, Surendran’s departure may pave the way for more PKR leaders, especially civil society figures like former Bersih Chairman Datuk S. Ambiga and Maria Chin Abdullah, to follow suit. These leaders are dissatisfied with PH’s decision to join Barisan Nasional in the Unity Government, feeling that PH has compromised on its reform agenda.
The disappointment among PH supporters has been further fueled by the release of Umno President Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi without being acquitted from corruption cases. The recent reduction in punishment and fines for Najib has added to the disillusionment among PH supporters, particularly those involved in civil society groups like Bersih and Suaram.
While Surendran’s departure may not significantly impact PKR’s future, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Perdana Centre lecturer Dr. Mazlan Ali believes that individuals like Surendran, who come from civil society backgrounds, have been disillusioned with PKR and PH’s failure to fulfill their promises made during the GE15 campaign. The current political landscape, operating under a Unity Government with various political parties, presents challenges in implementing reform promises.
Mazlan notes that the criticisms from activists like Surendran and NGO leaders like Ambiga must be viewed in the context of the current political reality. The limitations imposed by the Unity Government require a more pragmatic approach to reform, as opposed to idealistic expectations. While Surendran’s departure may be seen as hasty, Mazlan emphasizes the need for a gradual transformation process that considers various factors before making significant changes.
In conclusion, Surendran’s departure from PKR reflects the growing discontent among civil society leaders with the Unity Government’s actions and decisions. The criticisms and challenges faced by PH in fulfilling their reform promises highlight the complexities of governing in a coalition government. As Malaysia navigates through these political challenges, it is essential to balance idealism with pragmatism in pursuing meaningful reforms for the benefit of the country and its people.