The Education Ministry’s recent circular instructing all government education institutions to observe a solidarity week in support of the Palestinian cause has sparked controversy and disagreement among civil society groups. Seventeen organizations have come forward to voice their concerns regarding the event, stating that it was being held without proper discussions in the Dewan Rakyat or consultation with parents.
According to a joint statement released by the Global Human Rights Federation (GHRF) deputy president Peter John Jaban, the groups are deeply worried about the lack of consideration for the long-term impact of the event. The circular from the ministry’s deputy director-general outlined six activities to be carried out in schools, vocational colleges, matriculation colleges, and teachers’ education institutes nationwide from Oct 29 to Nov 3.
The activities listed in the circular include the launch of the Palestine Solidarity Week at school level, the launch of a donation fund, video and song presentations related to humanitarian issues in Palestine, spiritual activities for Muslim students, special co-curricular activities, and other appropriate activities. The Sarawak State Education Department had also announced the launch of the Palestine Solidarity Fund, involving all schools and institutions under its jurisdiction.
The civil society groups expressed their concerns about involving school children in the Middle East crisis, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a safe and neutral educational environment. They highlighted the role of schools in promoting moral ethics, values, and respect for human rights, as outlined in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Furthermore, the groups urged the Ministry of Education and the government to keep international politics, religious disputes, and war-related activities out of schools and education institutions. They emphasized the need to focus on economic revival and the well-being of Malaysian students studying abroad, especially in light of potential visa refusals and safety risks.
The statement was endorsed by various organizations, including Pertama, BoPiMaFo, ICON, Gindol Initiative for Civil Society Borneo, and several others. The diverse range of groups coming together to address this issue reflects the widespread concern and calls for a reevaluation of the Education Ministry’s directive.
In conclusion, the controversy surrounding the Education Ministry’s circular highlights the importance of maintaining a neutral and inclusive educational environment for students. The concerns raised by civil society groups underscore the need for careful consideration of the impact of such events on young minds and the overall educational experience. It remains to be seen how the government will address these concerns and ensure that schools remain a place of learning, growth, and respect for all.