In the bustling streets of India, where innovation meets tradition, two tech startups set out to capture the high potential-Indian market, embarked on very different journeys. While both companies share a fundamental similarity: their business ideas are inspired by US-based global enterprises, set out to capture the high potential-Indian market but their stories diverged dramatically. According to a RedSeer report, 80 per cent of Indian tech startups face challenges in scaling due to market saturation and intense competition from global giants. The business trajectory of Ola, often hailed as the Indian Uber, and Koo, the local answer to Twitter, offer valuable lessons in product management and marketing.
Ola’s success story began with a simple idea: to make transportation more accessible and affordable for millions of Indians. Over the years, Ola has continually innovated, with not only meeting the expectations of Indian consumers, with adaptation of its services, often exceeding it. Their latest venture, the Krutrim platform, is a testament to this spirit. By leveraging cutting-edge technology, Ola streamlined its operations eliminating its dependency on google maps and cut costs aiming to save INR 100 crores annually allowing it to pass it on benefits to their customers. Ola’s strategic moves are supported by the principles from Prof. Clayton Christensen’s renowned book, „Disruptive Innovation,“ which focuses on innovation strategies.
On the other hand, Koo’s journey has been a cautionary tale. Launched with the ambition to become the Indian Twitter, Koo initially garnered attention, especially during periods of political tension. However, it struggled to maintain user engagement and failed to scale. Despite its local flavour and initial surge, Koo couldn’t sustain its momentum as it couldn’t onboard prominent figures and influencers with huge fan following leading to a decline in active users over time. It also failed to match the features and functionalities to retain users. Koo also failed to implement effective marketing strategies, which hindered its ability to create strong brand positioning and achieve a lasting impression. All of this was compounded by financial constraints, and operational inefficiencies, leading to the firm’s recent closure. Seemingly, Koo forgot the importance of these downstream activities in gaining competitive advantage.
The contrasting paths of Ola and Koo highlight crucial insights for product managers and marketers. These stories emphasise the need for a nuanced approach to the Indian market. Ola’s Krutrim initiative exemplifies how strategic investments in technology and a focus on customer-centric solutions can drive success. Conversely, Koo’s experience illustrates the pitfalls of not fully understanding market dynamics and consumer behaviour. Ola’s ability to innovate continuously and adapt to technological advancements is key to its success. In contrast, Koo’s failure underscores the importance of deep market understanding and user retention strategies.
In a market as diverse and complex as India, the lesson is clear: innovation must be paired with a profound understanding of local needs and strategic foresight. By learning from both successes and failures, companies can navigate the intricate landscape and achieve sustainable growth.
Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals. Subscribe to our newsletter to get the latest insights & analysis.
Download ETBrandEquity App to get real-time updates and save your favorite articles. Scan to download the App.