The recent decision by the Supreme Court finding University of Santo Tomas (UST) Faculty of Civil Law Dean Nilo Divina guilty of simple misconduct has sparked controversy and raised questions about ethical standards in the legal profession. The case, which centered around Divina’s sponsorship of trips for officers of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) in Central Luzon, has shed light on the issue of gift-giving and its implications on professional conduct.
According to the 25-page decision promulgated on July 30, the Supreme Court found that Divina had violated Canon II, Sections 1 and 2 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability by sponsoring the officers‘ trips to Balesin Island Club and Bali, Indonesia. The court deemed Divina’s actions as excessive and crossing the line of propriety, leading to a fine of P100,000. Additionally, lawyers Peter Paul Maglalang, Winston Ginez, Jocelyn Clemente, Jade Paulo Molo, Enrique dela Cruz Jr., and Jose Dela Rama Jr. were also found guilty of simple misconduct for accepting Divina’s gifts and were fined P100,000 each.
In its decision, the court emphasized the importance of maintaining the appearance of propriety in personal and professional dealings. The receipt of exorbitant gifts was seen as compromising the ability of the lawyers to act with propriety, raising concerns about their ethical standards and integrity. The case highlighted the need for lawyers to uphold the highest standards of professional conduct and avoid any actions that may cast doubt on their integrity.
The case against Divina stemmed from an anonymous letter alleging illegal campaigning in a bid to be elected IBP-Central Luzon governor. While Divina expressed his intention to file a motion for reconsideration, he maintained his commitment to upholding professional standards and the rule of law. He hoped that by providing additional context, the Supreme Court would appreciate his perspective on the matter.
The decision against Divina and the other lawyers involved serves as a reminder of the importance of ethical conduct in the legal profession. Gift-giving and other forms of undue influence can undermine the integrity of the legal system and erode public trust in the legal profession. It is essential for lawyers to adhere to ethical standards and avoid any actions that may compromise their professionalism and integrity.
Moving forward, the case against Divina and the other lawyers should serve as a wake-up call for the legal profession to reexamine its ethical standards and ensure that all members uphold the highest levels of integrity and professionalism. By maintaining a commitment to ethical conduct, lawyers can uphold the rule of law and preserve the integrity of the legal system for the benefit of society as a whole.