In a surprising departure from traditional Republican ideology, author Roberts takes a critical stance towards law enforcement in his recent work, Dawn’s Early Light. The Thin Blue Line, typically revered by conservatives, is dismissed by Roberts as he condemns the FBI and local police departments alike. His scathing critique of the Uvalde police department’s response to a school shooting highlights his belief that law enforcement prioritizes compliance over competence and legalese over liberty. This departure from the standard Republican orthodoxy is a bold move by Roberts, who seems to have adopted a more anti-establishment view on policing.
Roberts’s disdain for law enforcement is further evident in his call for a shift towards vigilantism rather than relying on the police for public safety. He advocates for arming citizens and turning schools into battlegrounds, suggesting that individuals should take matters into their own hands rather than depending on law enforcement. This radical approach to public safety reflects Roberts’s belief that American institutions are beyond reform and that armed militias should take over the role of maintaining order in society.
The author’s vision for America is one of violence and chaos, reminiscent of the lawless frontier days. He romanticizes the idea of a society where individuals are armed and ready to defend themselves against perceived threats, painting a picture of an America where the nuclear family, the church, and firearms are the pillars of society. Roberts’s glorification of American violence and his belief in the inherent danger of Americans sets a stark contrast to the more civilized image of other nations.
Overall, Roberts’s perspective on law enforcement and public safety in Dawn’s Early Light is a radical departure from traditional conservative views. His call for vigilantism and the breakdown of American institutions in favor of armed militias reflects a deep-seated distrust in the government and law enforcement. While his vision of America may appeal to some who share his anti-establishment sentiments, it raises important questions about the role of law enforcement in society and the potential consequences of abandoning traditional institutions in favor of a more violent and chaotic approach to public safety.