In today’s society, there is a growing obsession with health and longevity, fueled by advancements in technology and an increasing fear of ageing and death. People are constantly seeking ways to monitor and improve their health, often relying on data and expensive interventions to achieve their desired outcomes. Nobel Laureate Venki Ramakrishnan, a renowned scientist in the field of biology, sheds light on this phenomenon in his book „Why We Die: The New Quest for Ageing and the Science of Immortality“.
Ramakrishnan’s book delves into the latest breakthroughs and research in ageing and biology, exploring the underlying causes of ageing and the quest for immortality. While humans have pondered the philosophical and religious aspects of death and immortality for centuries, it is only in recent decades that scientists have made significant progress in understanding the biological mechanisms of ageing. This newfound knowledge has sparked a surge in research funding from billionaires and governments alike, all seeking to defy death and cure disease.
One of the key points that Ramakrishnan emphasizes is the importance of ensuring that as people age, they remain healthy, independent, and productive. With life expectancy on the rise and birth rates declining, societies around the world are facing the challenge of an ageing population. In order to address this issue, Ramakrishnan advocates for greater flexibility in work and retirement ages, better housing and city design, and increased social contact for the elderly.
While the desire for longevity is universal, there is a stark economic disparity in access to healthcare and life-extending interventions. Wealthier individuals have a greater chance of living longer and healthier lives, highlighting the inequality that exists in the quest for immortality. However, Ramakrishnan stresses that simple interventions such as sleep, diet, and exercise are crucial for promoting longevity and overall well-being.
Despite the allure of living forever, Ramakrishnan raises an important question: would a world where people live to 120-150 years be a boring place? He argues that a more frequent generational turnover would make the world more dynamic and interesting, rather than stagnant with the same individuals lingering for extended periods. While radical life-extension advocates may generate hype and noise, they represent a minority in the anti-ageing research community.
In conclusion, Ramakrishnan’s book offers a thought-provoking exploration of the science of ageing and the quest for immortality. By understanding the biological basis of ageing, readers can evaluate future advice and separate hype from reality. While advancements in anti-ageing research hold promise for improving the quality of life in old age, it is essential to consider the societal implications of radical life extension. Ultimately, the quest for immortality raises profound questions about the nature of life and the value of mortality.